Social Policy stigma

loving Policy Theories and Concepts testify What do you understand by disfigurement and do you agree that sociable policies can mark off deal? If so, what is the dissolver? In this try on I give discuss what my brain of the word crisscross is, whether I agree or non if social policies deformitytize genuine groups of hatful and if so, what atomic number 18 the solutions to these fall guys attached to these groups. Stigma is a mark of disgrace that sets a person apart. When a person is label by their illness they argon entern as part of a stereotyped group. oppose attitudes create prejudice which leads to negative actions and diversity (www. entalhealth. wa. gov. au). In modern society, signs ar around almost of a negative kind. They build a negative effect on those be stigmatized and can cause experiences and fingerings such as shame, blame, hopelessness, and distress. In each shape out of the social services, approximately provisions argon stigmatizing and others are non but the reasons for the standard of stigmatization are non direct clear (Spicker, Stigma and Social well-being p. 36). Because stigma is socially onstructed, it varies from setting to setting, thither are some(prenominal) polar types of groups in society which all react differently to the stigmas which are appointed.All of these different reactions must be fenceed when planning social policies. In every different society not everyone is freeing to be content with policies that are made, some(a) may stigmatize groups of muckle and the groups who book been victims of accepted stigmas will also founder feelings of discontent, hopelessness and distress. Erving Goffman, one of the most definitive sociologists of the twentieth century, efined stigma as the address by which the reaction of others spoils normal identity. (Nettleton, 2006 95).Goffman retrieves that at that place are three types of social stigmas, including 1 . Stigma of purpose traits 2 . Physical Stigma 3. Stigma of group identity Goffman considers the stigma of character traits to be blemishes of individual character perceived as weak will, domineering, or unnatural passions, treacherous and rigid beliefs, and dishonesty, these being inferred from a realisen record of, for example, kind disorder, imprisonment, addiction, alcoholism, homo sexuality, nemployment, suicidal attempts, and radical political behavior. The carnal stigmas he refers to are different corporal formalities. When Goffman refers to the stigma of group identity he is referring to being of a particular race, nationality, devotion etc. whether or not a person understands or agrees with stigmas, they are passed on from one generation to the next, thus on that point will invariably be certain(p) stigmas associated with certain groups of mint. Stigma nowadays, would be considered a central issue in tattle to social welfare and social policy. When discussing stigma, it s important to mention the Poor Law. The stigma of the Poor Law is renowned.In the past and in many cases still today, people a good deal Judged others who claimed money trom the state in the torm ot benetl ts and on that point was a policy that mar ed k these people off from others in society. This left us with the debate whether or not welfare should be provided, to whom it should be provided and what kind of welfare? This concept of the unworthy and lazy public who refused to work was thought to be ethically corruptible by people relying on the state and not seek to improve their ndependent source of income or by any policy of substantial kindness. The pass extraneous remnants of the Poor Law were scrapped in 1948. The stigma of pauperism, which had seemed to be the result of a informed policy, has proved resilient to eradication. (Spicker, Paul, Stigma and Social Welfare, 1984, p 9) over the past a few(prenominal) geezerhood, people make begun to move a air from the idea of the Poor Law an d require begun to accept how social policies deal with groups of people who do not receive qualified independent income, although thither will always be slight stigmas attached o these groups. It is hard to understand why this is so, when admonitory policies have been deserted, right to realises established, and the administration of benefits has significantly changed.As Goffman has explained, stigmas can be carried in devil different ways stigmas can be discredited or discreditable. Discredited stigmas are those that a person cannot stop everyone else from knowing, for example stigmas that may be associated with a certain race or the use of a wheelchair whereas, discreditable is when a person cerebrates that the full general public do not know about heir stigma, due to the incident that it cannot be seen and is not distinctively obvious, for example, their sexual orientation or their religion. Kennedy, P (2013) divulge Themes in Social Policy). I believe that social poli cies do and do not stigmatize certain groups of people. I deliberate that the majority of the time the social policies that some may say attach stigmas to groups are alone highlighting the stigmas that already embody. I think that the Irish administration have created a durable system so as to prevent negative stigmatization. Unemployment benefit in Ireland is very generous, for this reason eople often attach negative stigmas to those who receive it.Many believe that those who receive unemployment benefit have short(p) motivation to find employment because they are so well funded, this also leads to many of them being stuck in the poverty trap. The presidential term started an initiative to encourage unemployed people to seek work. This initiative is a government-funded style known as FS. The government creating this agency and many unemployed people using it to gain training for future(a) employment should reduce the negative stigmas that are attached o those receiving une mployment benefit.Thus I consider that this initiative is a good solution to the stigmatization of unemployed people in Ireland. People may often feel stigmatized if the way in which they act is different to what are known as norms. This is definitely not fair or Just but it will always exist within society. For example, although our society is changing and funny people are becoming to a greater extent and more accepted in society, on that point are most definitely those who see them as different and do not accept them. Whether this is right or not does not take away from the feature that it appens.As a result, gay people will feel stigmatized because of their sexual orientation. This can be because of social policy because it is not the way in which we are told to behave and is not seen as a norm. As regards to these sort of stigmas, they will always exist within society for the first number of years until it becomes a more regular and frequently occurring thing. Thus I believ e that there are not any solutions to these torms ot stigmatizations . For the reasons that I nave discussed, I would agree that some social policies have caused stigmatism.